Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use Stripe Applications instead of Stripe Connect #3618

Open
MatthiasGabriel108 opened this issue Jan 25, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Use Stripe Applications instead of Stripe Connect #3618

MatthiasGabriel108 opened this issue Jan 25, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@MatthiasGabriel108
Copy link

MatthiasGabriel108 commented Jan 25, 2024

I was wondering why django-allauth uses Stripe Connect for auth, where it seems to me that since 2021, Stripe Applications are the way to go. Connect seems to mainly be used for handling payments, and it requires read_write scope. For our use case, and I believe many others as well, read_only is enough, but this scope isn't allowed with Connect, it's only allowed on Stripe Applications.

Here's some background info: https://support.stripe.com/questions/security-permissions-and-access-levels-when-connecting-your-stripe-account-to-a-third-party-platform#:~:text=Starting%20in%20July%202021%2C%20Platforms

@pennersr
Copy link
Owner

I must admit, I haven't used the Stripe provider myself. It was contributed by @akolpakov here:

#1190

If Stripe Applications is a completely different provider (different endpoints, different user payload, ...) then it would make sense to add a provider dedicated for that (stripe_apps ?) If it the differences are minimal, then we could add a setting to specify whether it is to run in Connect or Applications mode.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants