We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
In https://github.com/patio11/wrightverification/#do-you-believe-wright-is-satoshi you state "I'm mystified as to how this got past Andresen, though." This is even more the case when you read in this Wired article https://www.wired.com/2016/05/craig-wright-privately-proved-hes-bitcoins-creator/?mbid=social_gplus that Andresen undertook the test you suggest, that is "You should simply give him an arbitrary message..." Consequently Andresen still believes Craig Wright is Satoshi.
There is still a mystery here. Any further insights?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
In https://github.com/patio11/wrightverification/#do-you-believe-wright-is-satoshi you state "I'm mystified as to how this got past Andresen, though." This is even more the case when you read in this Wired article https://www.wired.com/2016/05/craig-wright-privately-proved-hes-bitcoins-creator/?mbid=social_gplus that Andresen undertook the test you suggest, that is "You should simply give him an arbitrary message..." Consequently Andresen still believes Craig Wright is Satoshi.
There is still a mystery here. Any further insights?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: