Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature Request: Support for SQLite #497

Open
mrchypark opened this issue Dec 27, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Feature Request: Support for SQLite #497

mrchypark opened this issue Dec 27, 2023 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@mrchypark
Copy link

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Currently, the project only supports PostgreSQL. This limitation can be a barrier for developers who prefer or require SQLite for its simplicity and lightweight nature. I often find myself constrained by the PostgreSQL-only support, especially in smaller projects or when working in environments where PostgreSQL is not ideal.

Describe the solution you'd like
I would like the project to include support for SQLite. This would allow for more flexibility in choosing the database system according to the project's scale and environment. It would also be beneficial for users who prefer SQLite for its ease of setup and minimal configuration.

Describe alternatives you've considered
An alternative could be using a database abstraction layer that supports multiple databases, but this might introduce unnecessary complexity. Direct support for SQLite would be a more straightforward and efficient solution.

Additional context
Adding SQLite support could potentially make the project more accessible and versatile for a wider range of users and use cases. This feature would especially be helpful for small-scale projects or educational purposes where a full-fledged database system like PostgreSQL might be an overkill.

@mrchypark mrchypark added the enhancement New feature or request label Dec 27, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant