Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make IMU Internal Temperature Available in the existing UDP IMU buffer #576

Open
arunumd opened this issue Feb 15, 2024 · 0 comments
Open
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@arunumd
Copy link

arunumd commented Feb 15, 2024

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Currently the IMU's internal temperature data is not available as part of the IMU data buffer

Describe the solution you'd like
Hello, I am aware of the fact that TDK Invensense already provides temperature data for their IMU that comes with the Ouster OS1 Rev7 Model Lidar. But the current Ouster IMU messages do not yet have this information populated. Currently the only way to get any kind of temperature data is through HTTP Request with the following command "GET /api/v1/sensor/telemetry". But this kind of HTTP request is very costly and comes at a very high response time due to the limitations of TCP connection. It would be excellent if you can populate the IMU's internal temperature into the IMU messages as part of the existing UDP transmissions.

Describe alternatives you've considered
I implemented a HTTP request for "GET /api/v1/sensor/telemetry". But this has led to packet losses due to the limitation of extended response time of HTTP connection.

Targeted Platform (please complete the following information only if applicable, otherwise dot N/A):

  • Ouster Sensor? [OS-1 Rev7]
  • Ouster Firmware Version? [3.0.1]
  • Programming Language? [C++]
    • For Python include the targeted Python version [NA]
  • Operating System? [Windows 11]
  • Machine Architecture? [x64 Intel]
@arunumd arunumd added the enhancement New feature or request label Feb 15, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant