Role for JSON or similar format with links for relating anonymized and not-anonymized data? #11
matthew-brett
started this conversation in
DICOM
Replies: 0 comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
By @ matthew.brett on November 12, 2021, 3:36pm
Please forgive this shot from the hip, but I was thinking about the text unpacking of DICOM that @ chafey showed us a while back.
I am wondering if that would be a useful way of dealing with anonymized and de-anonymized data.
In particular - I'm thinking of this pattern for archiving and retrieval:
The workflow would then be, that a researcher that needs particular de-anonymizing data, or that believes the withheld data is not de-anonymizing, can ask for access to the "identifying tree" or parts of the identifying tree. Because this tree is in text format, the administrator can easily see what information is contained, and can easily release parts of the tree.
The storage would be efficient because the 'identifying tree' does not replicate the information in the anonymous tree.
Would this be a reasonable and efficient way to keep usable versions of the underlying DICOM information, with less risk of leaking data you did not want to leak?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions