You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There are two ways to test an unconstrained solver on it.
Ignore the constraints completely. The problem may not be well-posed anymore. However, it does not hurt to benchmark unconstrained solvers on it and see which solver can decrease $f$ more at less cost.
Penalize the constraints. The possible penal functions are Courant (quadratic) and L_p. The penalty parameter should also be configurable.
Note that this may produce repeated problems, which I do not think is a big issue.
In the same way, we can also test bound-constrained solvers on linearly constrained problems, etc.
Thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The idea is to test as many problems as possible.
Consider a constrained problem
There are two ways to test an unconstrained solver on it.
Ignore the constraints completely. The problem may not be well-posed anymore. However, it does not hurt to benchmark unconstrained solvers on it and see which solver can decrease$f$ more at less cost.
Penalize the constraints. The possible penal functions are Courant (quadratic) and L_p. The penalty parameter should also be configurable.
Note that this may produce repeated problems, which I do not think is a big issue.
In the same way, we can also test bound-constrained solvers on linearly constrained problems, etc.
Thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: