Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for FRR and setkey Bidirectional #7434

Open
1 task done
michmoor0725 opened this issue May 3, 2024 · 3 comments
Open
1 task done

Add support for FRR and setkey Bidirectional #7434

michmoor0725 opened this issue May 3, 2024 · 3 comments
Labels
support Community support

Comments

@michmoor0725
Copy link

Important notices

Before you add a new report, we ask you kindly to acknowledge the following:

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
When setting up BGP peering with the password with a pfSense, OPNsense does not support the FRR and setkey Bidirectional
which is the much more secure way of implementing TCP MD5.
Relevant documentation: https://docs.netgate.com/pfsense/en/latest/packages/frr/bgp/config-neighbor.html

bgp peering does fail when suing setkey Bidirectional which indicates to me that OPNsense does not support that feature.

A clear and concise description of what the problem is including your motivation for the request,
i.e. "For the purpose of [...] I am missing a solution that will [...]."

Describe the solution you like
Support FRR and setkey Bidirectional when using BGP

A clear and concise description of what you want to happen.
Support FRR and setkey Bidirectional when using BGP

Describe alternatives you considered
The alternative is to use FRR and setkey Outbound which is less secure and does work with OPnsense.

@mimugmail
Copy link
Member

I thought that we use both directions but needs to be the same

@michmoor0725
Copy link
Author

So to confirm it is supported?

@AdSchellevis AdSchellevis added the support Community support label May 15, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
support Community support
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants