Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Transition Altitudes & Altimetry Units #189

Open
eliuuk opened this issue Jan 28, 2017 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #2097
Open

Transition Altitudes & Altimetry Units #189

eliuuk opened this issue Jan 28, 2017 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #2097
Assignees
Labels
feature Addition of a COMPLETELY NEW feature

Comments

@eliuuk
Copy link
Member

eliuuk commented Jan 28, 2017

A transition altitude is an altitude where the atmospheric pressure bug on the aircraft is reset from standard pressure (QNH1013 hectopascals or altimeter 29.92 inches of mercury) to the local atmospheric pressure.

Phraseology is changed too.

Example:

London Heathrow has a transition altitude of 6000ft. An aircraft, in this example, SHT3L is at FL240.
SHT3L d 120

SHT3L descend to flight level 120
(12000ft is higher than the transition altitude, so you say flight level)

SHT3L d 60

SHT3L descend to 6000 feet, QNH999 hectopascals
(6000ft is the transition altitude, a lower altitude would also say feet)

Is this something worth implementing if weather or METAR retrieval is implemented?

@erikquinn
Copy link
Member

erikquinn commented Jan 28, 2017

We could do this by adding transitionAltitude (value like 18000) and altimetry (values of qnh, hpa, mb, inhg) properties to an airport. Then different places could have the appropriate changeover altitude and pronunciation.

@erikquinn erikquinn changed the title Transition Altitudes: Flight Levels and Feet Transition Altitudes & Altimetry Units Nov 7, 2018
@erikquinn erikquinn added feature Addition of a COMPLETELY NEW feature and removed discussion labels Nov 7, 2018
@VJC009 VJC009 self-assigned this Jul 6, 2023
@VJC009 VJC009 linked a pull request Jul 9, 2023 that will close this issue
@VJC009 VJC009 linked a pull request Jul 9, 2023 that will close this issue
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature Addition of a COMPLETELY NEW feature
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants