You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There are restrictions to usage of public curb which vary over the year.
E. g. in Germany, there is the famous Oktoberfest (which we'll be assuming to happen in October during the course of this issue, though it's not ;) ).
Currently, the policy features the ability to be limited to a particular duration. However, the rule inside a policy does not.
Therefore, if an agency currently wants to publish special set of rules which will be valid starting and ending within an already known timeframe, the agency needs to
terminate the current policy before start of the additional rules
create a new policy which includes the additional rules at the very top
re-install the original policy after the end of the period
This is error prone, hard to visualize on a UI and tricky for operators.
Solution proposal
The rule could feature a duration property as per ISO_8601. This would not only allow to define a duration, but also recurring intervals.
Adding the duration to the rule of the same policy does not largely increase complexity as it is only respected during auditing.
Is this a breaking change
This is not breaking in the sense of technical breaking changes. However, those new restrictions to a rule would create effort at the provider's end => a major version bump is probably necessary.
Impacted Spec
For which spec is this feature being requested?
policy
Describe alternatives you've considered
Another option was to add a relationship between policies (e. g. "this special policy extends the following one"). If a rule from a special policy is applicable, the rules of the extended policy would not be evaluated. However, this idea was discarded as it introduces a new level of complexity.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Motivation
There are restrictions to usage of public curb which vary over the year.
E. g. in Germany, there is the famous Oktoberfest (which we'll be assuming to happen in October during the course of this issue, though it's not ;) ).
Currently, the policy features the ability to be limited to a particular duration. However, the rule inside a policy does not.
Therefore, if an agency currently wants to publish special set of rules which will be valid starting and ending within an already known timeframe, the agency needs to
This is error prone, hard to visualize on a UI and tricky for operators.
Solution proposal
The rule could feature a duration property as per ISO_8601. This would not only allow to define a duration, but also recurring intervals.
Adding the duration to the rule of the same policy does not largely increase complexity as it is only respected during auditing.
Is this a breaking change
This is not breaking in the sense of technical breaking changes. However, those new restrictions to a rule would create effort at the provider's end => a major version bump is probably necessary.
Impacted Spec
For which spec is this feature being requested?
policy
Describe alternatives you've considered
Another option was to add a relationship between policies (e. g. "this special policy extends the following one"). If a rule from a special policy is applicable, the rules of the extended policy would not be evaluated. However, this idea was discarded as it introduces a new level of complexity.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: