Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Requirements] Introducing an operator SLA concept on top of policy #756

Open
S-eb opened this issue Mar 31, 2022 · 2 comments
Open

[Requirements] Introducing an operator SLA concept on top of policy #756

S-eb opened this issue Mar 31, 2022 · 2 comments
Labels
Policy Specific to the Policy API Requirements Directly related to features in the Policy Requirements endpoint

Comments

@S-eb
Copy link
Collaborator

S-eb commented Mar 31, 2022

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

The policy concept is well used today to define rules of operations that an agency wants to enforce.
The policy specifications allows the definition of penalty that can apply when the rules are not applied.

Now most agencies SLA with operators are considering the overall operator operations not every single device, in order to give some flexibility. For instance: 80% of scooters should not have had a speed limit offense in the reporting period.

The current policy object is well design to enforce the rules, but does not allow the definition of global SLA such as the example above.

Describe the solution you'd like

A new overarching SLA concept in order to explain how a given agency will compute penalty in case a policy is not enforced.
Now before pushing in this direction, the question is: should MDS cover this use case? or should it be defined at each agency level without standardization, as long as the rules pushed to the operator follow the policy specifications

Is this a breaking change

  • No, not breaking

This SLA object would be a new concept on top of the existing policy ones.

Impacted Spec

For which spec is this feature being requested?

  • policy

Describe alternatives you've considered

No alternative consider in the scope of MDS

@schnuerle
Copy link
Member

I think this is a good concept with a need and would be pretty easy at least to use MDS to communicate an agency's SLA requirements. I think it would be a new field/area in the Policy Requirements endpoint, maybe per program the city is running.

A starting point could be OMF's sample SLA language about availability and response times.

Could even add SLA language around limiting the use of certain parts/options in MDS, like you see here with Event Types.

@schnuerle schnuerle added the Policy Specific to the Policy API label Apr 1, 2022
@schnuerle schnuerle changed the title Introducing an overarching SLA concept on top of policy [Requirements] Introducing an overarching SLA concept on top of policy Apr 1, 2022
@schnuerle schnuerle added the Requirements Directly related to features in the Policy Requirements endpoint label Apr 1, 2022
@S-eb
Copy link
Collaborator Author

S-eb commented Apr 6, 2022

Michael

I think the SLA link above is really linked to the MDS endpoints.

Here the SLA would be related to the MSP operations.

Seb

@schnuerle schnuerle changed the title [Requirements] Introducing an overarching SLA concept on top of policy [Requirements] Introducing an operator SLA concept on top of policy Jun 20, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Policy Specific to the Policy API Requirements Directly related to features in the Policy Requirements endpoint
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants