[PRE REVIEW]: Can you predict the future? A tutorial for the National Ecological Observatory Network Ecological Forecasting Challenge

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: @OlssonF (Freya Olsson)
Repository: https://github.com/OlssonF/NEON-forecast-challenge-workshop
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): main
Version: v1.1.0
Editor: Pending
Reviewers: Pending
Managing EiC: Lorena Barba

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://jose.theoj.org/papers/37e9e48c49abf89a619b787d106d79bd"><img src="https://jose.theoj.org/papers/37e9e48c49abf89a619b787d106d79bd/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://jose.theoj.org/papers/37e9e48c49abf89a619b787d106d79bd/status.svg)](https://jose.theoj.org/papers/37e9e48c49abf89a619b787d106d79bd)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSE @OlssonF. Currently, there isn't a JOSE editor assigned to your paper.

@OlssonF if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSE submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.02 s (569.7 files/s, 178106.2 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Markdown                         5            451              0           1837
Rmd                              4            400            592            599
TeX                              1              9              0            105
R                                2              9              7             32
YAML                             1              1              4             18
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            13            870            603           2591
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.5281/zenodo.8316965 is OK
- 10.1002/fee.2616 is OK
- 10.1002/ecs2.2567 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.01686 is OK
- 10.1073/pnas.1710231115 is OK
- 10.1111/2041-210X.13955 is OK
- 10.1515/9781400885459 is OK
- 10.21105/jose.00198 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None

[editorialbot]

Wordcount for paper.md is 2340

[labarba]

@OlssonF 👋
Let me start with an apology: I am the editor-in-chief and I have neglected JOSE for several months due to plain overwhelm. I have cut down on other service and am back here with intention of reviving our little alt-journal. Thank you for your submission! Given the time that has passed, do you have updates to the paper?

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[OlssonF]

@labarba Since the submission we have continued to develop and improve the tutorial and so some edits have been made to the code. We have made some minor edits to the paper.md this week that reflect these changes.

For reviewers, we would suggest S. K. Morgan Ernest, who recently published with you. In addition, from your reviewers database we suggest Jeffrey Hollister and/or Jem Stachelek, both R coders with backgrounds in ecology.

Thanks