[REVIEW]: An R Companion for Introduction to Data Mining

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: @mhahsler (Michael Hahsler)
Repository: https://github.com/mhahsler/Introduction_to_Data_Mining_R_Examples
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch):
Version: v1.0.0
Editor: @stats-tgeorge
Reviewers: @hughshanahan, @rudeboybert
Archive: Pending
Paper kind: learning module

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://jose.theoj.org/papers/1c21e289cb9c887b65cb58740f947f07"><img src="https://jose.theoj.org/papers/1c21e289cb9c887b65cb58740f947f07/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://jose.theoj.org/papers/1c21e289cb9c887b65cb58740f947f07/status.svg)](https://jose.theoj.org/papers/1c21e289cb9c887b65cb58740f947f07)

Reviewers and authors:

Please avoid lengthy details of difficulties in the review thread. Instead, please create a new issue in the target repository and link to those issues (especially acceptance-blockers) by leaving comments in the review thread below. (For completists: if the target issue tracker is also on GitHub, linking the review thread in the issue or vice versa will create corresponding breadcrumb trails in the link target.)

Reviewer instructions & questions

@hughshanahan & @rudeboybert, your review will be checklist based. Each of you will have a separate checklist that you should update when carrying out your review.
First of all you need to run this command in a separate comment to create the checklist:

@editorialbot generate my checklist

The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://openjournals.readthedocs.io/en/jose/reviewer_guidelines.html. Any questions/concerns please let @stats-tgeorge know.

✨ Please start on your review when you are able, and be sure to complete your review in the next six weeks, at the very latest ✨

Checklists

@hughshanahan, please create your checklist typing: @editorialbot generate my checklist

@rudeboybert, please create your checklist typing: @editorialbot generate my checklist

[editorialbot]

Hello humans, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.21105/joss.01686 is OK
- 10.18637/jss.v091.i01 is OK
- 10.18637/jss.v025.i03 is OK
- 10.32614/RJ-2017-047 is OK
- 10.18637/jss.v028.i05 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=5.92 s (11.8 files/s, 4540.8 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HTML                            19            695             45          11004
JavaScript                      18            853           1223           6185
Rmd                              9           1116           2249           1284
CSS                             10             96             81            856
TeX                              3             81              0            665
SVG                              1              0              0            288
Markdown                         3             28              0             93
YAML                             3              1              0             19
R                                2              1              3              5
Bourne Shell                     1              1              0              2
JSON                             1              0              0              1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            70           2872           3601          20402
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

[editorialbot]

Wordcount for paper.md is 492

[stats-tgeorge]

Thank you both @hughshanahan and @rudeboybert for agreeing to review this submission. Let's aim to complete your checklists by March 15th, 2024.

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[stats-tgeorge]

Hello @hughshanahan and @rudeboybert, this is a friendly reminder to review this submission. Thank you!

[stats-tgeorge]

Hello @hughshanahan, are you able to review this?

[stats-tgeorge]

Hello @rudeboybert, are you able to review this?

[rudeboybert]

So sorry @stats-tgeorge to have dropped the ball on this. It was a brutal semester. Do you still need this? If so, I can get it to you by the evening of Thu 6/30.

[stats-tgeorge]

Hello @rudeboybert. I am sorry to hear of the rough semester. I'm sure you are excited about summer then! I am still looking for people to review this. This is also my area so I can be a reviewer if necessary. I may see if others are available now that it is summer. Thank you for following up!