Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Increased thread pool sizes #594

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Dec 3, 2017
Merged

Increased thread pool sizes #594

merged 1 commit into from Dec 3, 2017

Conversation

kaikreuzer
Copy link
Member

Seeing errors like this, I very much assume that our safe caller thread pool is far too small - increasing the pool size should hopefully resolve such issues.

Signed-off-by: Kai Kreuzer kai@openhab.org

Signed-off-by: Kai Kreuzer <kai@openhab.org>
@openhab-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

This pull request has been mentioned on openHAB Community. There might be relevant details there:

https://community.openhab.org/t/error-freezes-openhab/36839/11

@kaikreuzer
Copy link
Member Author

Something is weird here - why does it try to resolve org.openhab.binding.seneye? This does not even exist in our openhab2 repo...

I guess the PR can be safely merged anyhow.

@openhab-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

This pull request has been mentioned on openHAB Community. There might be relevant details there:

https://community.openhab.org/t/jetty-update-karaf-4-1-3-upgrade-and-full-lsp-support/36354/88

@kaikreuzer kaikreuzer merged commit 8656553 into openhab:master Dec 3, 2017
@kaikreuzer kaikreuzer deleted the pools branch December 3, 2017 17:24
@kaikreuzer kaikreuzer changed the title increase thread pool sizes Increased thread pool sizes Dec 15, 2017
@kaikreuzer kaikreuzer added the enhancement An enhancement or new feature label Dec 15, 2017
@kaikreuzer kaikreuzer modified the milestone: 2.2 Dec 15, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement An enhancement or new feature
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants