Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Sensor or Observer #161

Open
KathiSchleidt opened this issue Jun 27, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

Sensor or Observer #161

KathiSchleidt opened this issue Jun 27, 2023 · 1 comment
Labels
data model sensing v2.0 This change should be discussed for v2.0 of the sensing document. tbd to be discussed

Comments

@KathiSchleidt
Copy link
Collaborator

When updating STA to align with OMS, should we retain the Sensor name, or modify this to Observer to better align with OMS?

@sgrellet
Copy link
Member

We clearly have 2 usages of Sensor in community applying STA 1.1

  • sensor instance (ex : this sensor with serial/number XYZ)
  • sensor type (ex : more as a codeList of ObservingProcedure)

In OMS, when we faced the situation that we had 2 different usages for the same element we simply removed the old one and clarified with 2 new information types

  • Feature Of Interest -> now we have ultimateFoI and proximateFoI
  • OM_Process : used for both sensor type and instances -> now we have Observer and ObservingProcedure (and no OM_Process anymore)

@hylkevds hylkevds added sensing v2.0 This change should be discussed for v2.0 of the sensing document. tbd to be discussed data model labels Jun 27, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
data model sensing v2.0 This change should be discussed for v2.0 of the sensing document. tbd to be discussed
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants