-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 178
Integrate infection sources #981
Comments
Hi there Thanks for your effort. I put the issue on the agenda of this week. Keep you posted. Best, Andreas |
Hi there We think this data fits into our repo. We're asking the FOPH to provide us with the categories (and definitions) of the infection sources first. We do not want to create another standard bottom-up by some cantons. We keep you posted about this. Best, Andreas |
I've added BS as well, there is data available in the weekly bulletins. |
Hi @maekke, have you found any reference to a standard for categories used by the cantons so far? |
@amslera it doesn't seem to be fully "standardized". I've put together the following list:
The BAG stuff is based on this news entry. The two right most columns show the number and I've put together a proposition for the categories that were used three times at least. Not sure if this is reasonable... I guess the "Andere/Sonstige" and "Ohne Angabe" might still be needed. |
Also added support for VS, based on the weekly bulletins. Not entirely happy with it, since it's text parsing and thus not very exact... |
Hey @amslera |
Hi @adrupp, I don't have the rights to close it myself. Can you close it as 'not planned'? Thank you. |
Would this be something of interest?
I've put something together for AG, ZG and ZH in https://github.com/maekke/infection_source
This could be integrated here as well...
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: