Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Publish flix to service #11

Open
bthaile opened this issue Aug 10, 2023 · 3 comments
Open

Publish flix to service #11

bthaile opened this issue Aug 10, 2023 · 3 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@bthaile
Copy link
Contributor

bthaile commented Aug 10, 2023

This would have to be a manual process.

Support user in publishing generated or updated flix to interaction template service.

@bthaile bthaile added the enhancement New feature or request label Aug 10, 2023
@bthaile bthaile changed the title Publish flix Publish flix to service Aug 10, 2023
@chasefleming
Copy link
Member

Does this make a PR to a service repo?

@JeffreyDoyle
Copy link
Member

We could consider adding functionality to the FLIX API to allow clients to submit new Interaction Templates to it, though we'd need to sketch out how that'd work safely.

A cheap win would be for it to open a PR to the FLIX API repo https://github.com/onflow/flow-interaction-template-service to add the new template.

@chasefleming
Copy link
Member

Problem with the PR method though is that flixkit has no authentication, so I'm not sure how you'd make a PR to a repo with the Github API. And there is no guarantee that Github is where a repo for an auditor or service may live. You could push it with shell commands if someone was logged in locally. But you can't make a PR with shell commands. And this is easy to do with a developers normal process. I'm not sure this feature is necessary enough to necessitate this. Might close this one.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants