You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
"the resulting SYCL version of Raytracing differs significantly from the original CUDA, and hence, their execution times are not directly comparable. The two main reasons for that are 1) the different random number generator introduced by DPCT, namely oneMKL’s philox4x32x10 [15], vs. the original cuRAND’s XORWOW [21]), and 2) the significant manual code refactoring we required to cope with CUDA virtual functions"
"the resulting SYCL version of Raytracing differs significantly from the original CUDA, and hence, their execution times are not directly comparable. The two main reasons for that are 1) the different random number generator introduced by DPCT, namely oneMKL’s philox4x32x10 [15], vs. the original cuRAND’s XORWOW [21]), and 2) the significant manual code refactoring we required to cope with CUDA virtual functions"
The paper is attached.
3624062.3624542.pdf
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: