You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We want to be able to use different parameterisation for thrust and power if necessary.
Current state
It's very common for power to be given as absolute values, while thrust is given as a coefficient. In our current setup, we have the same parameterisation for both power and thrust.
It's also awkward to have a 'cp' field containing power, with a boolean cp_is_coefficient.
Octue is an Open-Source Software organisation helping you and many others to fight climate change. Providing support for your issues costs us c. 500GBP/day. Might your organisation be in a position to help sponsor this issue?
We already are (eg via technical partnership or GitHub Sponsors )
Yes (we'll prioritise this issue, and be in touch)
No (we'll work on this issue as and when it aligns with our core development activity)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Feature request
Use Case
We want to be able to use different parameterisation for thrust and power if necessary.
Current state
It's very common for power to be given as absolute values, while thrust is given as a coefficient. In our current setup, we have the same parameterisation for both power and thrust.
It's also awkward to have a 'cp' field containing power, with a boolean
cp_is_coefficient
.Proposed Solution
Supporting Octue
Octue is an Open-Source Software organisation helping you and many others to fight climate change. Providing support for your issues costs us c. 500GBP/day. Might your organisation be in a position to help sponsor this issue?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: