You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
my app consists of multiple projects, that have dependencies on each other.
Is it possible to set Obfuscar in such a way, so that for each of these projects, Obfuscar will use different settings (different level of obfuscation), while still keeping the dependencies between those project working in the output?
So far, I have tried setting the KeepPublicApi and HidePrivateApi different for each < module > specified in the obfuscar.xml settings file, where each is referring to dll of one project. However, after examining the output in DotPeek, it looks like that the same setting, defined at the top level of the xml file, gets used for every module, regardless how the parameters are set under it's xml node.
Is there some way to achieve what I am describing, or is using different obfuscation settings for each module not possible at this time?
Thank you,
wish you nice Christmas holidays!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello,
my app consists of multiple projects, that have dependencies on each other.
Is it possible to set Obfuscar in such a way, so that for each of these projects, Obfuscar will use different settings (different level of obfuscation), while still keeping the dependencies between those project working in the output?
So far, I have tried setting the KeepPublicApi and HidePrivateApi different for each < module > specified in the obfuscar.xml settings file, where each is referring to dll of one project. However, after examining the output in DotPeek, it looks like that the same setting, defined at the top level of the xml file, gets used for every module, regardless how the parameters are set under it's xml node.
Is there some way to achieve what I am describing, or is using different obfuscation settings for each module not possible at this time?
Thank you,
wish you nice Christmas holidays!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: