Refactor docker_base to use inversion of control

[lathanh]

Pull Request Description

Use inversion of control in docker_base so that it can more strongly and easily ensure consistency between various implementations (GCP implementation to come).

This also includes teasing apart the several batch prep steps (weather, assets, and jobs) into their own methods so they can each be more easily understood, shared, and maintained.

Checklist

Not all may apply

• Code changes (must work)
  • This code works with the GCP implementation in our fork (to be merged later); we're unable to try it on AWS.
• Tests exercising your feature/bug fix (check coverage report on Checks -> BuildStockBatch Tests -> Artifacts)
  • test_docker_base.py passes
• Coverage has increased or at least not decreased. Update minimum_coverage in .github/workflows/coverage.yml as necessary.
• All other unit and integration tests passing
• Update validation for project config yaml file changes
• Update existing documentation
• Run a small batch run on Kestrel/Eagle to make sure it all works if you made changes that will affect Kestrel/Eagle
• Add to the changelog_dev.rst file and propose migration text in the pull request

[github-actions]

File	Coverage
All files	86%	✅
base.py	90%	✅
exc.py	57%	✅
hpc.py	78%	✅
local.py	70%	✅
postprocessing.py	84%	✅
utils.py	91%	✅
cloud/docker_base.py	89%	✅
sampler/base.py	79%	✅
sampler/downselect.py	33%	✅
sampler/precomputed.py	93%	✅
sampler/residential_quota.py	61%	✅
test/shared_testing_stuff.py	85%	✅
test/test_docker.py	33%	✅
test/test_validation.py	97%	✅
workflow_generator/base.py	90%	✅
workflow_generator/commercial.py	53%	✅
workflow_generator/residential_hpxml.py	86%	✅

Minimum allowed coverage is 33%

Generated by 🐒 cobertura-action against eccb933

[nmerket]

Today I learned inversion of control. Thanks for that. This looks good to me. I still would like to see these PRs getting entries in the changelog, so we can track when these things go in. Thanks for doing this. I'm really interested in seeing where this goes.

[lathanh]

I still would like to see these PRs getting entries in the changelog, so we can track when these things go in.

Sure; done!