Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add ligature for દૃ (dṛ) in Sans Gujarati #7

Open
vizzmay opened this issue May 28, 2020 · 5 comments
Open

Add ligature for દૃ (dṛ) in Sans Gujarati #7

vizzmay opened this issue May 28, 2020 · 5 comments

Comments

@vizzmay
Copy link

vizzmay commented May 28, 2020

  • દૃ = દ (U+0AA6) + ૃ (U+0AC3)

Serif Gujarati has a ligature for દૃ while Sans Gujarati displays a regular combination of letter and matra.

d-voc-r

  • Left: Noto Sans Gujarati, version 2.001, no ligature
  • Right: Noto Serif Gujarati, version 2.001, has ligature
@nizarsq
Copy link

nizarsq commented Jun 13, 2020

This issue reproducible on NotoSansGujarati.
Screen Shot 2020-06-12 at 8 48 59 PM

@simoncozens simoncozens transferred this issue from notofonts/noto-fonts Jun 20, 2022
@simoncozens
Copy link
Contributor

The strange thing is that both fonts have this syllable as a precomposed glyph; it is a ligature in both Sans and Serif, that the designer has drawn. They've just drawn it very differently. I wonder if there's some thinking that the Sans font should be more "regularised" or something?

@JelleBosmaMT, I know it was super long ago but can you remember the thinking here?

@JelleBosmaMT
Copy link

I found the oldest release from March 2013, which had the irregular variant. A couple of weeks later I changed it to the regular shape it currently has. I think the change is based on feedback, because I have a PDF showing some options of possible changes to some other conjuncts from the same time: which resulted in an update in July. At the end of the year there is another version, based on more feedback: so the current da-rvocalic has survived all reviews after the first.

@simoncozens
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks - so it sounds like the fix here (if there is one) would be the other way around, i.e. to remove the "ligature" from Sans and make it consistent with the "regular" form in the Serif.

@JelleBosmaMT
Copy link

I suspect both are OK.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants