Testing for functional guards

[milo526]

Description

There does not seem to be a proper way to test functional guard with spectator as yet.

It seems like they need to be tested using angular runInInjectionContext method.
https://netbasal.com/getting-to-know-the-runincontext-api-in-angular-f8996d7e00da

It would be nice to have first-class support for functional guards.

Proposed solution

Create a new API to test functional guards that can use spectators injector.

export const functionalGuard = (() => {
  const someService = inject(SomeService);

  return someService.canDoStuff();
}) satisfies CanActivateFn;

describe('functionalGuard', () => {
  let spectator: Spectator<theFunctionalGuard>;
  const createFunctionalGuard = createFunctionalGuardFactory({
    guard: theFunctionalGuard,
  });

  beforeEach(() => {
    spectator = createFunctionalGuard();
  });

  it('should test the guard', () => {
    spectator.runInInjectionContext((guard) => {
      // set some inputs for the guard, mock values

      expect(guard).toReturnWith(true);
    });
  });
});

Alternatives considered

More so a work-around than an alternative, creating an empty component and "stealing" its injector.

@Component({
  selector: 'app-empty-component',
  template: '',
  changeDetection: ChangeDetectionStrategy.OnPush,
  standalone: true,
})
class EmptyComponent {}

describe('functionalGuard', () => {
  let spectator: Spectator<EmptyComponent>;
  const createComponent = createComponentFactory(EmptyComponent);

  beforeEach(() => {
    spectator = createComponent();
  });

  it('should test the guard', () => {
    runInInjectionContext(spectator.inject(EnvironmentInjector), () => {
      // set some inputs for the guard, mock values

      expect(functionalGuard).toReturnWith(true);
    });
  });
});

Do you want to create a pull request?

I'd be open to trying to create a pull request if we can settle on a nice API.

[NetanelBasal]

You are welcome to play with some ideas you have and see what's the best fit and open a PR.

[milo526]

I've been working on this on-and-off and it turns out to be quite a bit more annoying than I anticipated.

The first step seems to be using TestBed.runInInjectionContext, this accepts a callback which will enable the use of the inject method.

Exposing it via the BaseSpectator (see snippet) allows us to use the injection context from any spectator object.

  public runInInjectionContext<T>(cb: () => T): T {
    return TestBed.runInInjectionContext(cb)
  }

spectator.runInInjectionContext(() => {
  const activatedRouteSnapshot = spectator.inject(ActivatedRouteSnapshot);
  const routerStateSnapshot = spectator.inject(RouterStateSnapshot);

  expect(functionalGuard(activatedRouteSnapshot, routerStateSnapshot)).toBe(true);
});

Some problems:

Functional guards most often use the CanActivateFn type

export declare type CanActivateFn = (route: ActivatedRouteSnapshot, state: RouterStateSnapshot) => Observable<boolean | UrlTree> | Promise<boolean | UrlTree> | boolean | UrlTree;

As of yet the ActivatedRouteSnapshot can be created using the ActivedRouteStub of spectator fairly easily, I have not been able to find a proper way to generate a RouterStateSnapshot.

I'll continue working on this and see if I can create something useful

(Progress in fork - https://github.com/RiskChallenger/spectator)