Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

allow use of .gz when specifying fast and gtf #313

Open
ChristopherMancuso opened this issue Mar 20, 2024 · 4 comments · Fixed by #276
Open

allow use of .gz when specifying fast and gtf #313

ChristopherMancuso opened this issue Mar 20, 2024 · 4 comments · Fixed by #276
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@ChristopherMancuso
Copy link

Description of feature

I was trying to run the scrnaseq pipeline specifying a fasta and gtf file. I downloaded from ensembl but they were gunzipped.

I searched Slack and found the same problem I was having and this answer that seems to have worked for me too
https://nfcore.slack.com/archives/CHN5BV5DW/p1706103433405269

I was wondering if it would be possible to allow the use of .gz files like this? I have used the rnaseq pipeline and it allows for the use of gunzipped files. Thanks for this amazing resource!

@ChristopherMancuso ChristopherMancuso added the enhancement New feature or request label Mar 20, 2024
@grst
Copy link
Member

grst commented Apr 4, 2024

Will be fixed as part of #276.

@nick-youngblut
Copy link

Just for the gtf of refdata-gex-GRCh38-2024-A, the file size balloons from 61 Mb to 1.7 Gb when gunzip'd. It will be great to be able to use the gzip'd versions of the fasta and gtf files.

@fmalmeida fmalmeida linked a pull request Apr 18, 2024 that will close this issue
10 tasks
@pinin4fjords
Copy link
Member

Still seems to be an issue in latest release

@grst
Copy link
Member

grst commented May 13, 2024

#276 has not been merged yet, this will be part of 2.7

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants