You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hello, why is it possible to assign a timeout value assigned by a channelMap/cfgMap to the Send Timeout box of an HTTP Sender, while the same channelMap/cfgMap cannot be assigned to the "Response Timeout" box of a TCP Sender?
Is it an oversight or is this behavior intentional, in the latter case could we know the reason?
Mirth Version 4.4.1
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Haha, like your stuff gets prioritized over all the other stuff here?
All kidding aside, if you pay for mirth, open a ticket. If you don't, your "bug" is probably a feature request. Even then though, there is no guarantee of a response from Nexgen.
Hello, why is it possible to assign a timeout value assigned by a channelMap/cfgMap to the Send Timeout box of an HTTP Sender, while the same channelMap/cfgMap cannot be assigned to the "Response Timeout" box of a TCP Sender?
Is it an oversight or is this behavior intentional, in the latter case could we know the reason?
Mirth Version 4.4.1
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: