Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[IDEA] Add option to suppress timeout errors on TCP Sender #6116

Open
mikeyw opened this issue Feb 23, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

[IDEA] Add option to suppress timeout errors on TCP Sender #6116

mikeyw opened this issue Feb 23, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@mikeyw
Copy link

mikeyw commented Feb 23, 2024

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
NOTE: This request is related to issue #1989

TCP Sender destinations with "Queue Messages" set to "Always" and "Queue on Response Timeout" set to "Yes"(#1989) trigger an alert when there is a timeout waiting for a response from the recipient.

Describe your use case
All alerts trigger an email to support staff to investigate the issue. Read timeouts are not considered a critical issue, as long as they do not persist for more than a set period of time.

Describe the solution you'd like
Two possible options:

  • Add an option in the TCP Sender to suppress connection error alerts for that destination
  • Update the TCP Sender logic to suppress alerts when "Queue Messages" is set to "Always" and "Queue on Response Timeout" is set to "Yes".

Describe alternatives you've considered
I have tried the following solutions:

  • Regular expressions in the alert configuration. Complex and not granular.
  • (Current Solution) Filters in a downstream channel that sends out the alert emails. While this prevents the alert emails from being sent, it fills up the logs with lots of filtered messages.

Additional context
Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request here.

@mikeyw mikeyw added the enhancement New feature or request label Feb 23, 2024
@pacmano1
Copy link
Collaborator

pacmano1 commented Feb 23, 2024

This applies to any destination / connector type doesn't it? If I undertand you correctly it is sorta "don't throw an error until the final disposition of the message (or maybe destination) is known". 100% agree with the ask.

@mikeyw
Copy link
Author

mikeyw commented Feb 23, 2024

@pacmano1 Exactly!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants