Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Regarding permissions, deck lacks granular permissions, making it difficult to implement at a large scale #5740

Open
wcdfilll opened this issue Apr 6, 2024 · 4 comments

Comments

@wcdfilll
Copy link

wcdfilll commented Apr 6, 2024

Currently, I find that nextcloud deck is not meeting the needs for large scale.

Why do I say that?

Large enterprises like ours need to manage granular permissions on Deck. But when I tried using it, I encountered a permissions issue - there is no permission option for employees so that they cannot delete boards or cards but can still upload files and comment. I don't see any permission in Deck that can do this.

For example, user1 is a department manager, while user2 is an employee. Deck currently has no way for employee accounts to be restricted from deleting boards/cards, editing boards/cards, but still allowing them to comment and upload attachments.

@small1
Copy link
Contributor

small1 commented Apr 10, 2024

Basically you want the can edit option to be granular with permissions like full, can delete, can edit or something like that?

@small1
Copy link
Contributor

small1 commented Apr 10, 2024

can edit can delete cards but not delete boards

@wcdfilll
Copy link
Author

wcdfilll commented Apr 11, 2024

Basically you want the can edit option to be granular with permissions like full, can delete, can edit or something like that?

That's basically it, because, I want my staff to be able to comment and attachment, but dont want them to be able to edit cards and tables

@wcdfilll
Copy link
Author

do you know what I mean ?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants