Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make it easier to join Slack #4

Open
davisshaver opened this issue May 2, 2015 · 10 comments
Open

Make it easier to join Slack #4

davisshaver opened this issue May 2, 2015 · 10 comments

Comments

@davisshaver
Copy link
Member

Let's make Daniel's life easier by adding a button to signup folks to Slack. We could setup Slack.in for this. See here for example.

@danielbachhuber
Copy link
Contributor

Good suggestion. It doesn't appear to have moderation functionality, but I've opened an issue about it: rauchg/slackin#53

@dannguyen
Copy link

Is there a current need to have moderation of who can join? I'm asking that as a Slack beginner, if using slack.in results in userspambots. I noticed that chat.18f.gov uses slack.in. It'd be great to be able to direct people to a link to join...not just for them but to save the mods some manual work.

@davisshaver
Copy link
Member Author

@dannguyen Good question. I have no reason to suspect spam. So another reason to ask this: Is there any one we would reject at this point?

@danielbachhuber
Copy link
Contributor

Is there a current need to have moderation of who can join?

I like moderation for the time being.

@jtannenwald
Copy link

I don't trust spambots to stay away?

@davisshaver
Copy link
Member Author

@daniel can you expand on why? I think that requiring people ask to join is a bit exclusive, even though our mods are a diverse bunch.

@danielbachhuber
Copy link
Contributor

I think that requiring people ask to join is a bit exclusive, even though our mods are a diverse bunch.

That's the intention — people like the feeling of being a part of a club. The feeling of exclusivity is fine when pragmatically you're inclusive.

@davisshaver
Copy link
Member Author

If we're just trying to act exclusive, I don't see the upside at all. There are going to be people turned away from the pretension of exclusivity if they expect that they wouldn't make the cut. I'm going on record against this policy as I think it's counter-productive to having a diverse news nerdery.

@danielbachhuber
Copy link
Contributor

I'm going on record against this policy as I think it's counter-productive to having a diverse news nerdery.

That's fine.

@juruwolfe
Copy link
Contributor

Yeah, I'd like to second Davis's point. I do think the appearance of exclusivity, even if we don't mean it to, keeps certain people/voices at bay. Not sure that cost is worth potentially being more alluring for voices that want to be part of the cool club.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants