Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Unit test failures: billesholm.osm file is missing and test files written on project root folder #357

Open
deniger opened this issue Apr 5, 2019 · 5 comments

Comments

@deniger
Copy link

deniger commented Apr 5, 2019

I'd like to propose a PR to migrate geotools from 14.4 to 21.0. See:

Before creating this PR, I launched unit tests and I have an issue with org.neo4j.gis.spatial.TestSpatial:
java.io.FileNotFoundException: target\osm\billesholm.osm

I believe that the file billesholm.osm is missing. Where could I find it ?

Another points:
it seems that some files generated by unit tests are stored in project root folder:
image
( I can try to modify this point and let unit test generate files in the target folder).

Last point: unit tests are not launched by travis. Should I modifiy travis to launch them ?

@craigtaverner
Copy link
Contributor

I like all suggestions.

  • Messy tests that output stuff outside target should be cleaned up to output to target
  • It would be good if travis CI ran unit tests, then mistakes like the missing billesholm.osm would have been caught
  • Fantastic that you've done work to port to newer geotools, and I'm looking forward to the PR to review.

@deniger
Copy link
Author

deniger commented Apr 6, 2019 via email

@craigtaverner
Copy link
Contributor

Yes, ignore the test. I will find the file and unignore the test when I do.

@craigtaverner
Copy link
Contributor

Also, for me to merge your PR's, please make sure to agree to the CLA, as described at https://neo4j.com/developer/cla/

@deniger
Copy link
Author

deniger commented Apr 7, 2019 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants