You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Everything in self.conf_i[i_j] is larger than self.conf_i[i_j].min() - 0.1, so will this mask not always evaluate to true everywhere?
Also, when calculating these masks, since we are evaluating pred_j (ie: points in the second view in the reference frame of the first, would it not make more sense to use conf_j instead of conf_i?
(More of an comment than a question) The idea behind iterating between all edges, running opencv's pnp, and choosing the best depthmap based on the average confidence score as defined by
seems a bit wasteful. Could one not first find the best pred_j for each image i as determined by average confidence, and then run pnp and get the scaled depthmaps only for those? That would reduce the number of opencv calls to pnp from num_edges to num_images
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks for the awesome work! I have a few questions about the init_from_known_poses method at
dust3r/dust3r/cloud_opt/init_im_poses.py
Line 24 in 01b2f1d
dust3r/dust3r/cloud_opt/init_im_poses.py
Line 43 in 01b2f1d
Everything in self.conf_i[i_j] is larger than self.conf_i[i_j].min() - 0.1, so will this mask not always evaluate to true everywhere?
Also, when calculating these masks, since we are evaluating pred_j (ie: points in the second view in the reference frame of the first, would it not make more sense to use conf_j instead of conf_i?
(More of an comment than a question) The idea behind iterating between all edges, running opencv's pnp, and choosing the best depthmap based on the average confidence score as defined by
dust3r/dust3r/cloud_opt/init_im_poses.py
Line 54 in 01b2f1d
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: