You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
all the tokens have a layout set to token but this series doesn't
there needs to be a uniquivocal way to determine whether a card is a token without looking at the parent set
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
If an entity is found within the "tokens" array of a set object, they are 100% a token. The layout doesn't necessarily determine the type. This is the same as all entities found within the "cards" array of a set object are 100% a card in the set, and not a token.
If this isn't clear, we can discuss it further, but I'm not inclined to change anything as of this point.
how does the entity know it's found within a token array? There might be a set->token relationship but not a object->token one. It's the same rationale why it's important for a cardObject to have their own setCode
all the tokens have a
layout
set totoken
but this series doesn'tthere needs to be a uniquivocal way to determine whether a card is a token without looking at the parent set
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: