You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When using having-econditions with entity-find-count, encountered below error
06:48:40.952 ERROR MoquiJob-1 o.moqui.i.c.r.FtlTemplateRenderer Error from FTL in render
freemarker.core.NonHashException: For "...[...]" left-hand operand: Expected a hash, but this has evaluated to a sequence (wrapper: org.moqui.util.MNode$FtlNodeListWrapper):
==> .node["having-econditions"] [in template "classpath://template/XmlActions.groovy.ftl" at line 212, column 65]
----
FTL stack trace ("~" means nesting-related):
- Failed at: #list .node["having-econditions"]["*"... [in template "classpath://template/XmlActions.groovy.ftl" in macro "entity-find-count" at line 212, column 58]
- Reached through: #recurse [in template "classpath://template/XmlActions.groovy.ftl" in macro "actions" at line 22, column 1]
- Reached through: #visit xmlActionsRoot [in template "classpath://template/XmlActions.groovy.ftl" at line 19, column 1]
----
at org.moqui.impl.actions.XmlAction.getGroovyString(XmlAction.java:119) ~[moqui_temp2194216266458823044WEB-INF_lib_moqui-framework-3.1.0-rc1.jar.:3.1.0-rc1]
at org.moqui.impl.actions.XmlAction.writeGroovyWithLines(XmlAction.java:85) ~[moqui_temp2194216266458823044WEB-INF_lib_moqui-framework-3.1.0-rc1.jar.:3.1.0-rc1]
at org.moqui.impl.actions.XmlAction.makeGroovyClass(XmlAction.java:104) ~[moqui_temp2194216266458823044WEB-INF_lib_moqui-framework-3.1.0-rc1.jar.:3.1.0-rc1]
at org.moqui.impl.actions.XmlAction.getGroovyClass(XmlAction.java:94) ~[moqui_temp2194216266458823044WEB-INF_lib_moqui-framework-3.1.0-rc1.jar.:3.1.0-rc1]
at org.moqui.impl.actions.XmlAction.run(XmlAction.java:61) ~[moqui_temp2194216266458823044WEB-INF_lib_moqui-framework-3.1.0-rc1.jar.:3.1.0-rc1]
at org.moqui.impl.service.runner.InlineServiceRunner.runService(InlineServiceRunner.java:59) ~[moqui_temp2194216266458823044WEB-INF_lib_moqui-framework-3.1.0-rc1.jar.:3.1.0-rc1]
at org.moqui.impl.service.ServiceCallSyncImpl.callSingle(ServiceCallSyncImpl.java:322) ~[moqui_temp2194216266458823044WEB-INF_lib_moqui-framework-3.1.0-rc1.jar.:3.1.0-rc1]
at org.moqui.impl.service.ServiceCallSyncImpl.call(ServiceCallSyncImpl.java:125) ~[moqui_temp2194216266458823044WEB-INF_lib_moqui-framework-3.1.0-rc1.jar.:3.1.0-rc1]
at org.moqui.impl.service.ServiceCallJobImpl$ServiceJobCallable.call(ServiceCallJobImpl.groovy:244) ~[moqui_temp2194216266458823044WEB-INF_lib_moqui-framework-3.1.0-rc1.jar.:3.1.0-rc1]
at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:264) ~[?:?]
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1128) ~[?:?]
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:628) ~[?:?]
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:829) ~[?:?]
Possible Fix
While exploring the similar behavior and analysing the XmlActions.groovy.ftl for the use of having-econditions in entity-find, replacing the code of line [1]
<#t><#if .node["having-econditions"]?has_content><#list .node["having-econditions"]["*"] as havingCond>.havingCondition(<#visit havingCond/>)</#list></#if>
with
<#t><#if .node["having-econditions"]?has_content><#list .node["having-econditions"][0]?children as havingCond>.havingCondition(<#visit havingCond/>)</#list></#if>
worked and produced the desired result.
I would like to suggest this change in XmlActions.groovy.ftl.
If this looks okay, can I add this an improvement PR?
When using having-econditions with entity-find-count, encountered below error
Possible Fix
While exploring the similar behavior and analysing the XmlActions.groovy.ftl for the use of having-econditions in entity-find, replacing the code of line [1]
with
worked and produced the desired result.
I would like to suggest this change in XmlActions.groovy.ftl.
If this looks okay, can I add this an improvement PR?
[1] https://github.com/moqui/moqui-framework/blob/master/framework/template/XmlActions.groovy.ftl#L214
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: