Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

suggestion: reboot with rescript core? #113

Open
JUSTIVE opened this issue Mar 13, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

suggestion: reboot with rescript core? #113

JUSTIVE opened this issue Mar 13, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@JUSTIVE
Copy link
Sponsor

JUSTIVE commented Mar 13, 2024

Seems that the Rescript team is going to remove Belt from the Rescript compiler and language(see), I suggest moving forward to rescript-core bindings, which is the new standard library in Rescript ecosystem.

I guess some of the bindings and APIs currently we've got won't match to rescript core's, but it's a matter of time the belt is going to be removed from the rescript, we have to move ASAP.

And, I think it will bring good momentum to reboot this library.

@mobily mobily pinned this issue Mar 20, 2024
@mobily
Copy link
Owner

mobily commented Mar 20, 2024

@JUSTIVE, thanks for letting me know! It's indeed a great moment to start over, I have already researched a few things, for instance: moving to Reason + Melange, and it's something I do really consider (but I haven't thoroughly tested the performance yet)

PS. thanks for your email! ❤️

@JUSTIVE
Copy link
Sponsor Author

JUSTIVE commented Mar 21, 2024

Reason + Melange?! That's a lot more bolder move than I thought. I thought this library's root is rescript(more precisely, Bucklescript) and all the core concepts of this library come from the rescript's GenType. Wouldn't it be too large to continue on this project(ts-belt)? Maybe it should be a whole separate project like 'ts-caml', or 'ts-reason'(just found this prior work, ts2reason).
My idea was to extend Belt's API with rescript core's, not to change the whole build system or architectures.

@JUSTIVE
Copy link
Sponsor Author

JUSTIVE commented Mar 23, 2024

btw, besides of rebooting the whole library, we need to improve current state. there are plenty of bugs and glitches to resolve. could you review, merge PRs and release new rc version?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants