-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 49
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Expanding the benchmark coverage of this repository for all the toolkits #143
Comments
When we originally started on this project (it was @zoq's GSoC project many years ago :)) the idea was to use this benchmarking system to compare mlpack's implementations against other implementations. But it's grown somewhat since then, and honestly, it's a pretty general-purpose benchmarking system, so I don't see any need to limit only to algorithms that mlpack supports.
Sure, I would imagine that there would be some interest. You might try posting it on the mlpack chat channel (IRC/Matrix/gitter/etc.): https://www.mlpack.org/community.html#real-time-chat |
Awesome, thanks for putting everything together.
Happy to help, just send you a request. |
@zoq @rcurtin I felt that this is a fantastic project where people can find which ml-toolkits are better for certain algorithms, and where the toolkits can improve themselves. So, I have been doing some work on my own that might be useful for this project. I have made a google sheet of the data I have been collecting in this regard. This google sheet contains:
I have till now covered all the algorithms provided by scikit-learn, mlpack and I am in the process of adding all the algorithms provided by Shogun into this list. This is a work in progress. I am going to add more algorithms to this list in the coming future and hopefully complete this. This is the google sheet that I am preparing:
I this regards I have some questions:
a) Is the aim of this project limited to benchmarking the algorithms supported mlpack? If no, I feel that having a sheet like this one, would help. (I got the idea of consolidating all this in a google sheet after I saw a google sheet on tensorflow's github when they were making tensorflow 2.0 and had to list all the API classes that needed some specific change).
b) Also, would it be possible for contributors from mlpack to also contribute to this sheet? I can give edit access. Currently, there are around 166 algorithms that are already listed with many more algorithms not covered and I haven't yet gone through all the library APIs. Would appreciate the help :)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: