At this year’s MLA convention in Austin, the editors of Digital Pedagogy in the Humanities: Concepts, Models, and Experiments, Rebecca Frost Davis, Matthew K. Gold, Katherine D. Harris, and Jentery Sayers, demonstrated the project’s innovative platform to an enthusiastic crowd. Now they invite you to continue the conversation by participating in the open peer-review process of the anthology’s third set of curated keywords. Each entry in the collection focuses on a keyword in the practice of digital pedagogy (ranging from “play” to “collaboration” to “design”), is curated by an experienced practitioner of digital pedagogy, and is supported by ten pedagogical artifacts, such as syllabi, prompts, exercises, lesson plans, Web sites, and student work drawn from courses, classrooms, and projects across the humanities.
Please visit https://digitalpedagogy.commons.mla.org to read and review the third set of keywords, now available for open review. The official review period for the third set of keywords will end on 22 February 2016. To allow those who discovered the project at the convention to fully participate in the volume’s development, the deadline for the second set of curated keywords has been extended to 31 January 2016. New keywords will be added in batches throughout 2016, with fifty keywords to be included in the final project.
##9-10 January 2016
Tell us your definition of "digital pedagogy". Results to be analyzed using Voyant tools. See Rebecca Frost Davis' blog post on why we're inviting you to participate in this defining
See Katherine D. Harris's blog post with slides and images from MLA 16 session #736, Sunday, January 10, 2015
The second set of keywords from Digital Pedagogy in the Humanities: Concepts, Models, and Experiments is now available for open peer review until 18 January 2016. The editors invite you to participate in open review by commenting on the overall quality and persuasiveness of the curated keywords. Please visit https://digitalpedagogy.commons.mla.org to read through and respond to the second set of keywords: Failure, Multimodal, Poetry, Professionalization, Project Management, Race, Sexuality, and Text Analysis
The editors get interviewed by Nicky Agate, MLA Commons, about the history, process, experimentation, and innovation of an open publishing and open peer review project, available here: https://scholcomm.commons.mla.org/in-development/an-interview-with-the-editors-of-digital-pedagogy-in-the-humanities-2
Join three of the project editors and seven curators for this Electronic Roundtable on Sunday, January 10, 2016, 10:15 - 11:30 AM in Lone Start G, JW Marriott at the 2016 Annual Convention of the Modern Language Association in Austin, Texas. Abstract, twitter handles, and more information available here: https://github.com/curateteaching/digitalpedagogy/blob/master/MLA2016.md
Digital Pedagogy in the Humanities: Concepts, Models, and Experiments, edited by Rebecca Frost Davis, Matthew K. Gold, Katherine D. Harris, and Jentery Sayers, is a dynamic open-access collection currently in development on MLA Commons. The editors invite your participation in the open peer review of this collection.
Each entry in the collection focuses on a keyword in the field of digital pedagogy (ranging from “queer” to “interface” to “professionalization”) and is curated by an experienced practitioner, who briefly contextualizes a concept and then provides ten supporting artifacts, such as syllabi, prompts, exercises, lesson plans, and student work, drawn from courses, classrooms, and projects across the humanities. New keywords will be added in batches throughout 2015, with fifty keywords to be included in the final project.
Please visit https://digitalpedagogy.commons.mla.org to read through and respond to the first set of keywords, now available for open review. The official review period for the first set of keywords will end on 3 August 2015.
Today we publicly announced the project. Looking forward to next steps!
With the Modern Language Association, we've agreed to build Digital Pedagogy in the Humanities via this open GitHub repository, meaning audiences can follow the project as it emerges over time. The project will also undergo an open review. Details soon.
We have a hashtag! Follow us at #curateteaching.