Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

about the camera params regression #272

Open
lvZic opened this issue Nov 11, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

about the camera params regression #272

lvZic opened this issue Nov 11, 2022 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@lvZic
Copy link

lvZic commented Nov 11, 2022

I found the cam params converge worse, and i use weak perspective in my code, in which kpy_2d = scale(kyp3d[, :2] + txy ). I think the key reason is the focal length of the dataset is different with each image, and it range from 400 mm to 800 mm. So maybe the network cannot regress the scale well?
As "It is common to assume a fixed focal length to perform perspective projection. " . I wonder if the performance would be improved if i use perspective projection instead of weak perspective?

@lvZic lvZic added the enhancement New feature or request label Nov 11, 2022
@lvZic lvZic changed the title about the params regression about the camera params regression Nov 11, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant