Skip to content

loader and template not found error #352

Answered by mitsuhiko
hnakamur asked this question in Q&A
Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

I have been thinking a few times to change this, but this is a stable API now and it's not worth breaking the API for. The main benefit is that you get an automatic error message for the common "not found" case and it makes it easier to compose loaders in theory.

Replies: 1 comment 1 reply

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
1 reply
@hnakamur
Comment options

Answer selected by hnakamur
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Category
Q&A
Labels
None yet
2 participants