Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Recursively search upwards for a changie config #652

Merged
merged 4 commits into from May 11, 2024

Conversation

miniscruff
Copy link
Owner

Closes #651

Check the following

  • Maintain high code coverage
  • Be properly formatted
  • Documentation changes are included
  • Include a change file if expected

Additional context
I am not sure if this should be behind a flag or env var or anything.
It should work just like git and that seems to work for everyone.

* Not sure if there is a better way, but we just keep going up
until going up does nothing.
Also upgrade linter and go version.
* too many failures, trying something else
Copy link

codacy-production bot commented May 11, 2024

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation Diff coverage
Report missing for 149452a1 77.78%
Coverage variation details
Coverable lines Covered lines Coverage
Common ancestor commit (149452a) Report Missing Report Missing Report Missing
Head commit (1f43a20) 2417 2253 93.21%

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details
Coverable lines Covered lines Diff coverage
Pull request (#652) 27 21 77.78%

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

See your quality gate settings    Change summary preferences

Codacy will stop sending the deprecated coverage status from June 5th, 2024. Learn more

Footnotes

  1. Codacy didn't receive coverage data for the commit, or there was an error processing the received data. Check your integration for errors and validate that your coverage setup is correct.

Repository owner deleted a comment from codecov bot May 11, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 11, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 70.00000% with 6 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 91.48%. Comparing base (5677d94) to head (b5dbc7d).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

❗ Current head b5dbc7d differs from pull request most recent head 1f43a20. Consider uploading reports for the commit 1f43a20 to get more accurate results

Files Patch % Lines
core/config.go 68.42% 3 Missing and 3 partials ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #652      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   95.78%   91.48%   -4.30%     
==========================================
  Files          15       20       +5     
  Lines        1661     1891     +230     
==========================================
+ Hits         1591     1730     +139     
- Misses         35      104      +69     
- Partials       35       57      +22     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@miniscruff miniscruff merged commit fa5835d into main May 11, 2024
4 of 5 checks passed
@miniscruff miniscruff deleted the 651-recursively-search-for-config branch May 11, 2024 23:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Recursively look for .changie.yml
1 participant