Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

.Net: Update the Chat Completion With Data #6112

Closed
2 tasks
markwallace-microsoft opened this issue May 3, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #6454
Closed
2 tasks

.Net: Update the Chat Completion With Data #6112

markwallace-microsoft opened this issue May 3, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #6454
Labels
enhancement .NET Issue or Pull requests regarding .NET code

Comments

@markwallace-microsoft markwallace-microsoft added enhancement .NET Issue or Pull requests regarding .NET code triage labels May 3, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot changed the title Update the Chat Completion With Data .Net: Update the Chat Completion With Data May 3, 2024
github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jun 3, 2024
…ta classes (#6454)

### Motivation and Context

<!-- Thank you for your contribution to the semantic-kernel repo!
Please help reviewers and future users, providing the following
information:
  1. Why is this change required?
  2. What problem does it solve?
  3. What scenario does it contribute to?
  4. If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here.
-->

Fixes: #4787
Fixes: #6061
Fixes: #6448
Fixes: #6112

Discussion:
#6016 (reply in thread)

There are two reasons why this change is required:
1. Azure .NET SDK supports `chat completion on your data` functionality
out-of-the-box, which means that now we don't need custom
implementation.
2. `Chat completion on your data` new API has [breaking
changes](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/ai-services/openai/references/on-your-data),
which makes current `WithData` classes non-functional.

### Description

<!-- Describe your changes, the overall approach, the underlying design.
These notes will help understanding how your code works. Thanks! -->

1. `AzureChatExtensionsOptions` property was added to
`OpenAIPromptExecutionSettings`. Initial idea was to add it on
`AzureOpenAIChatCompletionService` class level (in all constructors and
extension methods), but it looks like this configuration contains some
properties which should be useful per request (e.g. index name, search
filter etc). Later, we can also add it on service class level, if needed
(although I would do that when Options classes for all
`AddChatCompletion...` extension methods will be introduced, to avoid
more parameters in these methods at the moment).
2. `AzureChatExtensionsOptions` property is marked with `JsonIgnore`
attribute, because it's still needs to be investigated if this
configuration is serializable. It supports not only Azure AI Search
configuration, but also [other
configurations](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/ai-services/openai/references/on-your-data#data-source)
like Azure Cosmos DB for MongoDB, Pinecone etc. We can release it
without JSON serialization first, to unblock code-first customers, and
we can add support for JSON serialization later (i.e. `config.json`
files), if there will be such request.

Note: It looks like `OpenAIPromptExecutionSettings` is not ideal place
for Azure-specific `AzureChatExtensionsOptions` property. I was thinking
to add derived `AzureOpenAIPromptExecutionSettings :
OpenAIPromptExecutionSettings` class (and unmark
`OpenAIPromptExecutionSettings` as sealed), but this looks like some
scope of work which should be implemented when OpenAI and Azure OpenAI
functionality will be separated by SDKs.

### Contribution Checklist

<!-- Before submitting this PR, please make sure: -->

- [x] The code builds clean without any errors or warnings
- [x] The PR follows the [SK Contribution
Guidelines](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md)
and the [pre-submission formatting
script](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#development-scripts)
raises no violations
- [x] All unit tests pass, and I have added new tests where possible
- [x] I didn't break anyone 😄
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement .NET Issue or Pull requests regarding .NET code
Projects
None yet
2 participants