Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

A question in 3.1 Implementation #36

Open
lsvery666 opened this issue Nov 30, 2020 · 1 comment
Open

A question in 3.1 Implementation #36

lsvery666 opened this issue Nov 30, 2020 · 1 comment

Comments

@lsvery666
Copy link

Hi, thanks for your great work, but I have one problem about cross view fusion. In 3.1 Implementation, you note that "Different channels of the feature maps share the same weights". The so-called "weights" mean that "non-corresponding locations on the epipolar line will contribute no or little to the fusion". However, the corresponding location should be determined by the depth of the corresponding 3d joint, right? Therefore, in my opinion, the depth of the 3d joint should influence the so-called "weights". I'm wondering why you say that different channels share the same weights, since different joints should have different depths. Could you give me a more specific explanation, thank you very much.

@haibo-qiu
Copy link

haibo-qiu commented Dec 11, 2020

Yes, different channels represent different joints that have different depths.

However, our fusion is achieved by the specific-trained fc layer (i.e., by matrix multiplication), which means that for each location, there are unique weights (a column inside the matrix) that indicate how this location should contribute to the target map. In this way, all the pixels (locations) of the feature map with different depths contribute accordingly. Figure 3 in our paper illustrates the process.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants