'constructor' should be allowed as the name of a static member

[DanielRosenwasser]

The following should be allowed:

class C {
    static constructor() {

    }
}

However, we report an error that a static modifier can't precede a constructor.

After reading through the spec a bit, I think we should reconsider how we wire up constructor in the compiler. It seems as if constructor is not special in any way, and that it simply places a member named constructor on the prototype. See here for more details.

[RyanCavanaugh]

You just have to write

class Foo {
    static 'constructor'() {

    }
}

This seems preferable to the world of "Why isn't TypeScript invoking my static constructor?"

[mhegazy]

related to #442

[bterlson]

This is maybe understood but while constructor isn't special syntactically, it is special semantically. Eg. Foo.prototype.constructor is just a reference back to Foo, whereas other members are actually installed on Foo.prototype.