Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

WG Corporate member missing from content #122

Open
autumnfound opened this issue Sep 22, 2022 · 4 comments
Open

WG Corporate member missing from content #122

autumnfound opened this issue Sep 22, 2022 · 4 comments

Comments

@autumnfound
Copy link

A new member was added to the Microprofile working group, which isn't present on the new site. Primeton Information Technologies has joined the Working Group as a Corporate Member. You can see the new entry in our membership API https://membership.eclipse.org/api/organizations?working_group=microprofile (look for 1401, which is the organization ID for Primeton). Looking at the site, they are missing from the homepage and the carousel on https://microprofile.io/workinggroup/

@ZahraFazli
Copy link

Hi, just pinging here to see if anything is required from our end to upload Primeton's logo on the MicroProfile website.
Thanks

@chrisguindon
Copy link

chrisguindon commented Oct 13, 2022

Adding to this conversation.

We don't require any WG to use our API but it's strongly recommended since it does simplify the maintenance aspect of keeping our member's logos up to date.

From the foundation point of view, adding Primeton Information Technologies on the website is the next priority.

@cesarhernandezgt I see that you've been contributing to this site. Can you help with this request or point us to the person responsible for maintaining this website?

@cesarhernandezgt
Copy link
Member

@ZahraFazli
The process to add/update your corporate logo is described in https://github.com/microprofile/microprofile-wg/wiki/MicroProfile-Working-Group:--Members-Onboarding#organizations-required-items, please take a look and doesn't hesitate in open a new issue on https://github.com/eclipse/microprofile-marketing/issues

Thank you, @autumnfound and @chrisguindon, for the heads up.
A bit of context and next technical actions points:

Context:
https://microprofile.io/workinggroup/ page has been managed via WP Engine, and the process for onboarding/updating working group member data is this one: https://microprofile.io/workinggroup/

Late in 2021, this repository https://github.com/microprofile/microprofile-site/ started a reworking process forward one of the WG github issues: microprofile/microprofile-wg#65. The scope of this project doesn't include any automation on WG onboarding, as explained above.

In Agust and September 2022, there were some actions on how to simplify, still from the WP engine administration point of view, the WG page: eclipse/microprofile-marketing#711 and eclipse/microprofile-marketing#701

On September 2022 I saw the announcement of Martin over the WG API via [email](https://www.eclipse.org/lists/microprofile-wg/msg01589.html) . @rstjames opened eclipse/microprofile-marketing#719, and based on the Github conversations, @aeiras merged the ticket in into eclipse/microprofile-marketing#701

Actions:
My opinion is that base on the current status of eclipse/microprofile-marketing#701. the integration of the WG API can be added to the WP engine, but this timing and priority need to be presented on the Microprofile Marketing Committee, I'll make sure this is added in the next committee meeting.

@chrisguindon
Copy link

@cesarhernandezgt Thanks for the update!

@ZahraFazli We will let you engage with the WG per their instructions for adding a member:
https://github.com/microprofile/microprofile-wg/wiki/MicroProfile-Working-Group:--Members-Onboarding#member-delivers-to-the-mpwg

We will keep this issue to track the effort of using our API to manage members on the microprofile.io website.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants