Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature request: compare standards/settings (unassigned types, etc.) #25

Open
RevitIRL opened this issue Apr 10, 2018 · 0 comments
Open

Comments

@RevitIRL
Copy link

My test comparison was actually between two versions of our project template (since Autodesk's Model Compare gives many false positives), but it seems that Metamorphosis is only focused on model changes, so it missed a new Level type and Object Styles subcategory (though it caught the change to the type of the level being used, and a new Material). It would be nice if it would compare as many standards/settings as possible (maybe with a filter to ignore unassigned types, to keep it clean when just comparing client models). I know there are some settings (like Line Weights) which aren't visible to the API, but Level Types, etc. would be nice to see.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant