You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The bridges are manually sorted on purpose. Not all third-party platforms will have the same interest for visitors, and the weight was added to put the more prominent platforms first.
Right now the algorithm to give a weight to a bridge is my own familiarity with a platform, which is bad. Happy to discuss about alternatives to get a better algorithm though!
The bridges are manually sorted on purpose. Not all third-party platforms will have the same interest for visitors, and the weight was added to put the more prominent platforms first.
Right now the algorithm to give a weight to a bridge is my own familiarity with a platform, which is bad. Happy to discuss about alternatives to get a better algorithm though!
I feel like the easiest is just to go alphabetically tbh. Thats the most unbiased way of sorting without providing a sort button.
The goal here is to provide the best user experience. I believe putting the most relevant bridges first delivers the best value for people browsing the page. I don't think the foundation needs to be unbiased here, since those are third party platforms and not Matrix projects
Since this is a manual task the weights need to be fixed for a an alphabetical sorting manually again.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: