Replies: 7 comments 6 replies
-
You don't need to be able to type it, so supporting Markdown isn't necessary – but you do need to be able to display posts as-written when they're simple rich text. Compare the above, with different emphasis:
The meaning's quite different! Most people using social media aren't thinking about formatting incompatibility when sending messages to each other. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Agree on the fact that Mastodon shouldn't just use plain text rendering for the content, as that breaks text entirely. Here's an example from an instance using glitch-soc, which adds Markdown and HTML formatting support: And for comparison is here the same post but viewed with the official Android app: Weirdly enough are embedded links supported, but lists aren't. Not even a basic line break is used in that case and instead everything is squeezed together in an unreadable mess. I sadly can't test how other vanilla Mastodon instances render this post (URL is here. Would appreciate if someone can share the result), but I would assume it's probably the same? Either way, even if Markdown wouldn't be supported (Let's be honest: It should. It's way to good to not implement), should posts at least look the same across instances and not break appart if one doesn't use the same version and/or extensions/additions. IF Markdown would ever be added should there be an option to see a preview of the content, so that you can correct wrong formatting before posting. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I love the idea of adding markdown. I don't know why Twitter never implemented it. Seems like a straightforward feature to accept underscores and double-asterisks (like GitHub does here) - I'd love to understand why it wouldn't be straightforward. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I've made an issue for it here btw #18958 Please upvote it!! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Markdown is supported by Elk, too: It looks like nearly all other 3rd party clients support Markdown and the Mastodon web client itself is the last one missing this feature. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Mastodon supports rendering rich text statuses since 4.2 (or 4.1?) Authoring rich text statuses is on the roadmap, we looked at using the feature from Glich SOC but is has some issues that we have not been able to solve yet. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
The original Mastodon web client in v4.2.3 (latest, released two weeks ago) does not support Markdown (this issue is about Markdown, not a HTML subset or other formats): |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I guess this would make more sense as a discussion.
Mastodon is the biggest Fediverse platform. And with every single other Fediverse platform already supporting basic markdown, new and old... So, so much information gets lost. Bold, italics, etc. have so much meaning and can dramatically change how a sentence is read.
Not even blockquotes are visible on Mastodon, it's all just plain text. How am I supposed to know that it's a quote? You can't.
I love this platform, and don't want these disconnects between platforms. It doesn't matter if you just don't like it. You can't just choose to not add it anymore.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions