Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Persistent storage tests: Run against multiple baselines, normalize, and extend test coverage #1464

Open
poodlewars opened this issue Mar 28, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
test engineer Issue that is good for an engineer in test to work on.

Comments

@poodlewars
Copy link
Collaborator

poodlewars commented Mar 28, 2024

PR #1462 made a start on extending persistent storages test coverage.

But the existing persistent storage tests run on a large matrix, checking interop between every 2 elements in this Cartesian product:

{reader, writer}
X
{windows, linux}
X
{python3.6..3.11}
X
{master ArcticDB, single baseline ArcticDB}

They do not support testing where one version writes, and then another version tries to modify that data.

To support tests like that, eg the tests in PR #1462 , we should:

  • Make the tests in the Cartesian product as simple as possible (basic read + write)
  • Introduce a new sort of persistent testing that runs just on Linux with Python3.11
  • On this new setup we can write more involved tests that can freely mutate data (as there won't be another test run also trying to mutate it)
  • We can introduce more testing without massively slow test runs
  • We can run against an arbitrary number of baselines (eg 1.6.x, 3.0.0, 4.0.x)
@poodlewars
Copy link
Collaborator Author

We will prioritise this after we have a dedicated test engineer

@poodlewars poodlewars added the test engineer Issue that is good for an engineer in test to work on. label Apr 19, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
test engineer Issue that is good for an engineer in test to work on.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant