Governance: identify consensus on non-participation and write documentation

[lucasgonze]

We need to think about how to get a quorum when TSC members go inactive. It should be a quorum of active voters. So many voters have stopped responding to calls for votes that we are unable to finish them.

The activity on the meetings of TSC or any other committee is considered contribution. The person who has attended meeting had contributed his time, and that is no different from any other contribution.

Use https://gist.github.com/lucasgonze/0be5db9dee45e9fd85fbe7d062d0f83f for drafting

See #15347

[lucasgonze]

Breaking it down:

• Eligible participation types to be considered active
• Time threshold to be considered inactive
• What to do if we fall below the threshold
• Minimize size for project viability

[lucasgonze]

#15375

[lucasgonze]

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1MD7-JTxxXlkvrjr6SAnIjrJ5SkA68n79Zd9etnPey84/edit?usp=sharing

[lucasgonze]

Final draft, ready for TSC vote: https://github.com/lucasgonze/magma/blob/governance-reset-v2/GOVERNANCE.md

[lucasgonze]

Call for vote:

• Ready to forward upwards to other parties as a proposed proposal, but not for final approval
• If they ask for changes, they will be made before acceptance
• Whether or not they make changes, there will be a later vote on final acceptance
• Vote +1: Jordan, Jim, Yogesh, Som, Lucas (unanimous)