New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
cicd, scale and long-run testing effort #87
Comments
I tried running long running iperf sessions as per the blog .. After restarting loxilb dockers randomly, sometimes the traffic stream gets reset and stops. It is not exactly reproducible and works well most of the times but might need further analysis. |
…on multiple failovers
PR - CICD test cases updated - #87
PR - Enhancements to cicd:Wait for cluster ready in cluster tests #87
I would be interested in benchmarking loxilb in a common real world scenario. Maybe I can build it in such a way that it can be reused for your CI. What is the most common use case for loxilb? Is it just HTTP you think it is also used for something like redis (https://docs.redis.com/latest/rs/networking/cluster-lba-setup/)? |
https://github.com/giltene/wrk2/ might be preferable to https://github.com/wg/wrk (via https://marioskogias.github.io/docs/heels.pdf) |
Scale and performance are the defining factors for load-balancers. Although we have some performance numbers with wrk, we need to get some scale numbers eg. how many sessions , how many CTs etc. We need to find a proper open-source tool for this testing e.g Trex
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: