chocolately search support

[ALINRUISU]

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

Chocolatey client unable to search BaGet to install chocolatey packages

Steps to reproduce the issue

Added BaGet as source

C:\admin\projects\chocolatey\awscli>choco source add -n=poc -s="http://BaGet:5555"
Chocolatey v0.10.13
2 validations performed. 1 success(es), 1 warning(s), and 0 error(s).
Added poc - http://BaGet:5555 (Priority 0)

Failure 0 package found

C:\admin\projects\chocolatey\awscli>choco search
Chocolatey v0.10.13
2 validations performed. 1 success(es), 1 warning(s), and 0 error(s).

Validation Warnings:
 - A pending system reboot request has been detected, however, this is
   being ignored due to the current command being used 'search'.
   It is recommended that you reboot at your earliest convenience.

[NuGet] Not able to contact source 'http://BaGet:5555'. Error was Invalid URI: Invalid port specified.
[NuGet] Not able to contact source 'http://BaGet:5555'. Error was Invalid URI: Invalid port specified.
0 packages found.

I have no problems pushing to Repo, only searching

C:\admin\projects\chocolatey\awscli>choco push cwrsync.5.4.1.nupkg --source="http://BaGet:5555" --api-key="test123" --force
Chocolatey v0.10.13
2 validations performed. 1 success(es), 1 warning(s), and 0 error(s).

Attempting to push cwrsync.5.4.1.nupkg to http://BaGet:5555
cwrsync 5.4.1 was pushed successfully to http://BaGet:5555

Describe the solution you'd like

Allow Chocolatey to search BaGet and be able to pull and install chocolatey packages

Describe alternatives you've considered

None ATM

[stamepicmorg]

@ALINRUISU Hello. This ticket is duplicate of this: #187

Official reply of developer here: #187 (comment)

---

ps: I am waiting for search realisation too.. 😔

[gep13]

We, the Chocolatey Team, are currently working on a new release of Chocolatey, which will include support for the NuGet V3 specification. This is currently available in a beta format, and it should allow you to use Baget and Chocolatey together. If anyone is interested in this, it would be great if you could take the beta for a spin, and let us know any feedback. Feedback can be provided here:

chocolatey/choco#2995

Thanks!