Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow Gateways to Specify the Selection retry Timeout #3037

Closed
rickstaa opened this issue Apr 30, 2024 · 1 comment
Closed

Allow Gateways to Specify the Selection retry Timeout #3037

rickstaa opened this issue Apr 30, 2024 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
AI Issues and PR related to the AI-video branch. type: feature New feature or request

Comments

@rickstaa
Copy link
Contributor

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

After #3033 is merged the Gateways tries for 2 seconds to find compatible Os that can do a AI job. Currently this value is hardcoded. We might want to give Gateways a way to set this value in the future.

Describe the solution you'd like

I would like to add a CLI flag that Gateways can use to increase or decrease the default value.

Describe alternatives you've considered

I did not yet consider alternatives.

Use Case

No response

Expected Outcome

No response

Additional context

No response

@rickstaa rickstaa added type: feature New feature or request AI Issues and PR related to the AI-video branch. labels Apr 30, 2024
@rickstaa rickstaa self-assigned this Apr 30, 2024
@rickstaa
Copy link
Contributor Author

rickstaa commented May 8, 2024

Closed in favor of a better communication protocol where the gateway communicated with the dApp about how far a job is. Dapps can then decide themselves to disconnect and try again.

@rickstaa rickstaa closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale May 8, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
AI Issues and PR related to the AI-video branch. type: feature New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant