Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

awesome talk at FOSDEM #818

Open
coderofsalvation opened this issue Feb 6, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

awesome talk at FOSDEM #818

coderofsalvation opened this issue Feb 6, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels

Comments

@coderofsalvation
Copy link

coderofsalvation commented Feb 6, 2024

Thanks @nojhan for the awesome talk on liquidprompt.
I was very happy to find out about liquidprompt since I was searching for something like this:

something dependency free

(most prompts require setting up a python/ruby/whatever toolchain)
liquidprompt doesn't get any simpler than source <file>

something batteries-included

I don't care about customizing my prompt, I prefer an opiniated one containing some sort of philosophy.

Anyways I guess I wanted to say thanks for showing up at FOSDEM, I'm a liquidprompter now

Perhaps mentioning dependency-less and batteries-included in the descriptions would distinguish it a bit better from the other psychedelic design-your-own-prompt solutions.

@coderofsalvation coderofsalvation added the enhancement Feature request label Feb 6, 2024
@Rycieos
Copy link
Collaborator

Rycieos commented Feb 8, 2024

Thanks @nojhan for the awesome talk on liquidprompt. I was very happy to find out about liquidprompt since I was searching for something like this:

I'm glad @nojhan's talk went well! Happy to hear we have another convert.

Perhaps mentioning dependency-less and batteries-included in the descriptions would distinguish it a bit better from the other psychedelic design-your-own-prompt solutions.

I agree. Though "dependency free" might be slightly misleading, as we do have some dependencies. We even have a section on that in the docs. Maybe "dependency light" would be a better phrase to use? (Unless that is what you meant with "less", in which case, great.)

But I agree that "batteries included" is a good phrase to use. That should probably go right in the README as a section, probably here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants